# Imperative or First-Person Button Copy A/B Test Idea

Page: https://alidemirbas.com.tr/en/lab/ab-test-library/tests/imperative-or-first-person-button-copy-ab-test-idea

## Hypothesis

"Start" may read as a short instruction telling visitors what to do, while "I'm starting" may read as a decision they made themselves. Which one leads to a higher action completion rate depends on context and the page's language; the label that sounds more natural on the page could carry more visitors through the action.

## When to run this test

Consider comparing the two verb forms when the label seems not to fit the page, such as usability sessions where people find it stiff or bossy, survey comments about its wording, or few clicks relative to impressions. If one label feels more natural, more visitors in that arm complete the same action and fewer leave. If people drop off after the click, look at that next step first; a label will not fix it. Run the test only on buttons that do not complete an order, and never let first-person copy imply a decision the user has not made; a paid action keeps its confirmation step.

## Primary metric

**Action completion rate**: Compare completion of the same action among eligible assigned visitors. Clicks are diagnostic, not the success outcome.

## Other metrics

- **Purchase conversion rate (CR)**: Compare completed actions per eligible assigned visitor; clicks alone are not success.
- **Page exit rate**: Compare page exits after the CTA appears, using the same window.
- **Repeat visit rate**: Compare assigned visitors over the same follow-up period; this is not a direct measure of brand perception.

## What to check before and during the test

- **Verb form**: Compare an imperative label with a natural first-person label for the same action.
- **Context**: Keep the action and actual commitment the same; other commitment levels require a separate test.
- **Brand tone**: Choose wording that fits the established tone of the page.
- **Fit**: Keep button size fixed and make sure both labels remain readable.
- **Visitor history**: Review new and returning visitors separately.

## What to watch when reading the result

- Button clicks are diagnostic only; the share of visitors who complete the same action settles the test. Do not read a difference in repeat visit rate as a direct measure of brand perception.
- Keep button color and size identical in both arms, or you cannot tell whether the verb form or the look caused the difference. To keep the page consistent, run it on a screen with a single main button; if buttons on the same page use different verb forms, the experience becomes inconsistent and the result measures that inconsistency more than the label.
- The evidence covers this CTA and its action only; actions with a different level of commitment need their own test. Do not switch every button on the site at once; roll the winning form out gradually and review new and returning visitors separately.
- Before calling either label better, enter each arm's visitors and completions in the [A/B test significance calculator](https://alidemirbas.com.tr/en/calculators/ab-test) to see whether the gap is beyond chance. Two labels that differ only in verb form may produce a small gap, so report an unclear result as inconclusive rather than as a preference.

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Should first-person wording be expected to perform better?

No. Compare two accurate labels without assuming a lift. Choose wording natural for the context, language and established page tone.

### Which metric should decide the test?

Completion of the same real action per eligible assigned visitor. Clicks are diagnostic. Repeat visits are not a direct measure of brand perception.

### Can I'm starting be problematic for a paid action?

If a button finalizes a paid order, its label must clearly convey the payment obligation. Run this comparison on buttons that do not finalize the order. Start or I'm starting must not conceal a financial commitment.