# Opening Links in a New Tab During a Flow: A/B Test

Page: https://alidemirbas.com.tr/en/lab/ab-test-library/tests/opening-links-in-a-new-tab-during-a-flow-ab-test

## Hypothesis

If the predefined external links open in a new tab, the form or checkout stays open behind them and visitors can pick up where they left off after reading. Completion of the original flow may improve, though switching tabs may confuse some visitors on mobile and weaken the effect.

## When to run this test

A funnel drop right after clicks on help, policy or external-resource links, or session recordings of visitors who cannot find their way back to the form or checkout step, are good reasons to try this test. Visitors who open the link should then return to the original tab and finish the flow. If returning visitors lose the data they entered, fix data preservation first; do not use a new tab to patch that problem or to keep visitors from leaving the site.

## Primary metric

**Completion of the original flow**: Compare completed form or checkout actions among all eligible assigned visitors after they use one of the predefined external links.

## Other metrics

- **External-link click-through rate**: Measure clicks on the tested external links among all eligible assigned visitors.
- **Return to original flow**: Compare assigned visitors who return to the original form or checkout and continue within the same window.
- **Flow data-loss rate**: Track cases where entered form data or checkout state is lost in either arm.

## What to check before and during the test

- **Target**: Open the same predefined links in the current tab or a new tab.
- **Scope**: Fix the eligible help, policy or external-resource links before launch.
- **Expectation**: Keep the link label; notify visitors that the new-tab version opens a new tab.
- **Return**: Track resumed activity and completed actions.
- **Device**: Review actual tab switching and return behavior on mobile.

## What to watch when reading the result

- A rise in external-link click-through or in return to the original flow does not justify shipping by itself. Completion of the original flow is the decision metric; also check that the flow data-loss rate does not climb in either arm. A gap that comes from lost data means you have not measured tab behavior.
- The result covers only the help, policy and external-resource links you fixed before launch, so do not treat it as a case for opening every link on the site in a new tab. Look at each device on its own, since switching tabs and coming back work differently on mobile.
- Only some visitors use the tested links, so the comparison can stay thin and the difference unclear. Find the visitors per arm you need for the effect you care about with the [sample size calculator](https://alidemirbas.com.tr/en/calculators/sample-size-calculator), then divide by daily eligible traffic per arm to plan how long the test must run.

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Which links should be included?

Predefine suitable help, terms or external-resource links leaving a form or checkout. Do not open every site link in a new tab. Preserve wording and destination except for the required behavior notice. Use original-flow completion as the primary outcome.

### Should users be told that a new tab opens?

Yes. Add the required notice while preserving descriptive link text. Unannounced behavior can confuse users, especially on mobile. Review actual tab-switching and return behavior.

### Why does preserving form data matter?

Preserve entered data and checkout state in both groups. Otherwise the test may measure data loss rather than tab behavior. Track losses and fix persistence rather than using a new tab to conceal the problem.

### What should be monitored besides original-flow completion?

Compare return and resumed interaction with the original form or checkout among all eligible assigned visitors within the same window. Measure external clicks only for the tested links.