Pricing
Annual Total or Monthly Equivalent Price A/B Test
A monthly equivalent can make an annual commitment look more affordable at first glance, but visitors may mistake it for monthly billing. Test the price framing while keeping the annual total and billing schedule clear; track cancellations and payment disputes as well as initial revenue.
A/B test scenario. This page is a test plan, not the result of a real experiment.
- Pricing
- Revenue per visitor (RPV)
Control vs Variant
The same value, presented two ways.
- Changed
- Format
- Page
- Pricing
- Difference
- changed
Hypothesis
If the main price shows the monthly equivalent, the annual commitment may look more affordable at first glance and more visitors may choose the annual plan. The result could be higher revenue per visitor, but if visitors mistake the monthly figure for monthly billing, the gain may come back as cancellations and disputes.
Test plan
When to run this test
Exits right after the annual price appears, a low annual plan selection rate or questions about the monthly cost are signs that the annual total puts visitors off. With the monthly framing, more visitors in the variant should pick the annual plan, and those who see the total at the payment step should not abandon in surprise. Check pricing-display rules first in regulated markets, and if monthly billing is not available, do not launch until the variant says so plainly.
How to measure success
Revenue per visitor (RPV)
Compare revenue per assigned visitor over the same period and assess later losses separately.
Also track
- Early cancellation rateMake sure cancellations caused by unmet expectations do not increase.
- Payment-step abandonment rateCheck whether exits increase when visitors see the total amount.
- Annual plan selection rateCheck whether more visitors switch to a longer commitment.
- Payment disputes or refund requestsTrack price-surprise contacts relative to purchases.
How to set it up
- Reference amountCompare the annual total as the main price with the monthly equivalent as the main price.
- TotalKeep the annual total readable on the same screen.
- BillingState when the annual payment will be charged in both arms.
- ScopeKeep annual pricing and terms unchanged; showing a daily equivalent is a separate comparison.
- Buyer typeReview individual and business buyers separately.
What to watch when reading the result
- 1Do not declare the variant a winner because annual plan selections or initial revenue went up. Read revenue per visitor alongside the early cancellation rate and payment disputes or refund requests, and do not ship if those rise, since an expectation mismatch can undo early sales.
- 2The result speaks only for this annual price and this monthly framing; showing a daily equivalent is a separate test. Review individual and business buyers separately, and read any rise in payment-step abandonment as possible surprise at a total noticed late.
- 3Cancellations and refunds arrive after the first sale, so a short run may miss them; do not close an unclear test early. For the run length, divide the sample per variant from the sample size calculator by daily traffic per arm. Add the cancellation follow-up period on top, set it up front, and hold the decision until it ends.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a monthly equivalent of annual pricing mislead buyers?
Yes, if confused with monthly billing. Keep the annual total and collection timing readable. Explicitly state when monthly payment is not offered.
Does higher initial revenue establish a gain?
Use revenue per visitor as the primary outcome with cancellation, refund and payment-dispute guardrails. An expectation mismatch can reverse an early sales increase.
What if checkout abandonment increases?
Visitors may discover the annual total later than expected. Check direct amount-related feedback rather than inferring surprise from drop-off alone. Inspect predefined buyer groups.
More tests in Pricing
All testsShowing Unit Price Next to Package Totals A/B Test
PricingRevenue per visitor (RPV)
Experiment example adding a per-unit figure beside the package total, covering how it eases comparison and how it can crowd the price area or oversell.
One-Time Payment Wording A/B Test on a Pricing Page
PricingRevenue per visitor (RPV)
A test idea that adds a no-auto-renewal line beside the price, with the subscription-fatigue reasoning behind it and the comparison burden it may create.
Tax-Inclusive vs Tax-Exclusive Pricing A/B Test
PricingRevenue per visitor (RPV)
Experiment setup comparing a final tax-inclusive figure with a tax-excluded price plus a separate tax line, including market and buyer-type considerations.