Pricing
How Many Pricing Plans Should You Show? Test Idea
The set of plans on screen can change both the effort required to choose and how plans look in relation to one another. The experiment cannot run until the two exact plan sets are defined. Keep each retained plan’s price and features unchanged; the result applies to those sets, not to plan count in general.
A/B test scenario. This page is a test plan, not the result of a real experiment.
- Pricing
- Revenue per visitor (RPV)
Option A vs Option B
How many are shown is the variable, not what they look like.
- Changed
- Quantity
- Page
- Pricing
- Difference
- changed
Hypothesis
In a set without the plan whose features overlap with another, visitors may compare the remaining options with less effort and hesitate less. The simplified set could then beat the full set on revenue per visitor, though that depends on which plan those buyers would turn to instead.
Test plan
When to run this test
Support questions about which plan to buy, session recordings of visitors moving back and forth between plans, or a rarely chosen plan whose features largely overlap with another are good reasons to try a slimmer plan set. When simplification helps, visitors who see the smaller set settle on a plan more easily, and revenue per visitor reflects it. If the hesitation comes from prices or unclear plan contents, fix those first, and pick the plan to remove for its overlap, not to leave the plan you most want to sell as the only path.
How to measure success
Revenue per visitor (RPV)
Once both plan sets are defined, compare revenue per eligible assigned visitor over the same period.
Also track
- Average plan valueUse plan value to explain revenue; a lower average does not necessarily mean lower revenue per visitor.
- Plan selection rateCompare the share of visitors who select any plan.
- Cancellation or downgrade rateCompare cancellations and downgrades after the same follow-up period.
- Plan-selection support requestsTrack questions about choosing a plan using the same visitor denominator.
How to set it up
- Plan setsCompare the current set with a version that removes one redundant tier, selected before launch based on overlapping features and the prior 90 days of plan selections.
- Keep constantKeep prices, plan features and card design unchanged.
- RevenueDecide using revenue per visitor, not plan selection alone.
- Selection mixReview how plan choices shift to explain the result.
- AudienceReview customer groups separately without changing assignment rules.
What to watch when reading the result
- 1A higher plan selection rate is not enough to ship the simplified set; revenue per visitor makes the call. A lower average plan value can still come with steady revenue, and more selections can still come with less of it, so read them together and compare cancellation or downgrade rates once both arms reach the end of the follow-up period.
- 2The result describes these two plan sets, not plan count in general. Keep existing subscribers of the removed plan out of the test, review customer groups separately, and treat removing a different plan as a new test.
- 3Revenue per visitor swings more than a selection rate, so a small gap may be noise at your traffic level. Before a rerun, get the sample per variant for the current plan selection rate and your target lift from the sample size calculator, then count the days of traffic per arm it takes; revenue, being noisier, needs even more. Also note how plan-selection support requests moved.
Frequently Asked Questions
How should the plan to remove be selected?
Choose one whose features substantially overlap with other plans using a predefined historical period. Exclude existing subscribers to the removed plan. The result concerns these two specific plan sets.
Is more plan selection enough?
No. Use revenue per visitor as the primary outcome. Average plan value and conversion explain the result but cannot replace it.
How can unsuitable purchases be detected after simplifying plans?
Monitor cancellations, downgrades and plan-selection support over equal follow-up windows. Do not remove alternatives simply to force buyers into one commercial choice.
More tests in Pricing
All testsComparison Table or Plan Cards on a Pricing Page
PricingRevenue per visitor (RPV)
A test example putting a row-by-row plan comparison table against separate plan cards, with the reasoning for each format and the metric being tracked.
Price First or Benefits First on a Pricing Page
PricingRevenue per visitor (RPV)
Experiment idea that moves the price above or below the benefit section, showing what each order does to expectation setting and to perceived value.
Annual Total or Monthly Equivalent Price A/B Test
PricingRevenue per visitor (RPV)
A/B test idea that swaps the headline price between a full annual figure and its monthly equivalent, with notes on how clearly the total must stay visible.
